headermask image

header image

CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules

Bog RollWhen I was looking for some information on Carterfone rules, I ran across this PDF from the CTIA about how the Carterfone rules should not apply to the wireless industry. I tend to disagree. Let me pick apart their talking points:

Requiring wireless networks to support any, generic device would erode the levels of service quality that wireless consumers have come to expect and demand. Um, isn’t this why the FCC exists, to ensure handsets meet the specific standards they claim to support? The fact is, I use “unapproved” handsets on AT&T and T-Mobile all the time–without issue. And their “support” claim? They hardly support handsets they sell.

Requiring commercial wireless networks to support any, generic device would compromise wireless network and handset security. Let’s look at Europe, where open handsets are the norm. Can anyone point to a single problem reported out of Europe that resulted from a generic device being on the network? Anyone?

2007 Industry Structure and Technology render 1968 Carterfone principles moot. Yeah, instead of a monopoly, we have an oligopoly. And the technologies are fairly stable, GSM and CDMA having been around the block for a while. Oh sure, new protocols are coming online. Isn’t that the FCC’s job to ensure devices are performing to standards?

Adopting Skype-rules would Chill Innovation and Raise Prices for Consumers. How so? There is nothing preventing you from continuing to give away your lousy handsets in exchange for 2 years of servitude. I will agree that it will chill innovation–as it comes from the carriers. Much like the Carterfone rules did for the public switched telephone network, innovation will come from the device manufacturers.

As usual, I’m not buying what the CTIA is selling, but let me know what you think!

Pay-Per-Use Versus Bundles: Really A Predictable Cost?

dsc04669_0012a.jpgI was thinking more about the difference between buying a bundle of minutes–at a fixed monthly cost–versus paying for minutes as you go. I’m trying to figure out why such a thing caught on here in North America, but doesn’t seem to have caught on so much elsewhere.

The only thing I can think of–speaking from my own experience–is that it brings a certain predictability to the monthly cost. I know that my service is going to cost $X a month. It’s much easier to plan my budget when I know how much something is going to cost per month.

If you never go over your allotment of minutes, and never even get close to that limit, consider this: you’re likely paying for minutes you never use. Even if you take into account the “free” night and weekend minutes or mobile to mobile minutes, the overall number of minutes may, in fact, be lower than the bucket you purchased. For my wife, this was most certainly the case. Before we went prepaid, she was on a 300 minute plan and almost never used that many minutes in a month. The one month she did, overage city!

Anyone who has ever gone over their allotment of minutes knows that those overage minutes add up pretty fast. Many years ago, I was on one of AT&T Wireless’ first nationwide no-roaming/long distance plans. They allowed you to change the minute bucket you were on and would backdate it into the current billing cycle–which was very cool and something they no longer do. I had called in to place myself on the largest bucket of minutes possible. Even doing that, I had gone over my minute allotment by several hundred minutes and thus my phone bill was about double thanks to overage charges.

The question is: why are those extra minutes so much more costly than the minutes I got discounted in a bundle? How come if I go over a 450 minute allotment extra minutes cost $0.45? Do they really cost that much to provide an extra few minutes of service?

I will admit that there are some people who likely do quite well under the current regime of minute bundles along with free night/weekend minutes and free mobile-to-mobile. All of those people who are essentially overpaying for service are subsiding those who are making these “free” calls. Does that seem right to you?

The only reasonable approach here to pay for exactly what you use–no more. I know that when I buy my $100 voucher for T-Mobile Pay As You Go, I will get 1000 anytime minutes that are good for a year. If I spend $40 a month on a post paid plan, I get 450 minutes per month. Do I get to keep them if I don’t use them? No. Even AT&T’s “rollover” gimmick doesn’t let you keep all your unused minutes, though it’s much better than the other carriers.

Whether you are a heavy user or not, it pays to shop around. Prepaid plans may be cheaper than you think. It’s the closest thing we’ve got to “pay per use” pricing here in the U.S. The carriers have these plans, but they are for large businesses only. Why is that? Because businesses–particularly multinational ones–know a better way and have demanded it. Why can’t regular consumers do the same thing? Oh yeah, they simply don’t know better.

We Want More Porn!

I don’t think this song needs any introduction.

Via IGotSpam?!

The 90 Minute Stevenote in 60 Seconds

Having come down with a case of strep throat on the opening day of MacWorld meant that I missed out on the joy of hitting F5 on my web browser or eventually getting around to reading about it in Google Reader. Thanks to the folks at Mahalo Daily, I don’t have to:

Apple TV looks a bit more interesting with the new features and the price drop. Except for the fact that I have TVs from the late 1980s and the Apple TV doesn’t support composite output. sigh

Free Sex–But Only If We Can Broadcast It

freier_.JPGWell, I can’t say I’m surprised someone thought of this, but the folks at Big Sister have an interesting proposition for you: you can have sex in their brothel for free, but only if they can tape the experience and broadcast it on the Internet. Quoting from Bloomberg.com:

Big Sister is marrying 21st-century technology with the world’s oldest profession to profit from the public’s appetite for ever-more graphic reality TV. Since 2005, more than 15,000 men have taken up the offer of free sex in return for 15 minutes, or less, of fame, according to the brothel. Big Sister is now expanding into the U.S. with a local version of its Web site.

It’s an interesting lesson in giving something away for free so you can make money on it from someone else, even if you don’t necessarily agree with the subject involved.

Via Businesspundit, photo by Julica de Costa via Wikimedia Commons

Nice Rack!

My New RackThis is what I spent my Monday night building. I purchased this rack through Rack Solutions. I purchased the optional front and back cover as well as the handles and heavy-duty casters. The unit arrived by UPS Ground in 3 separate boxes and took me about an hour to get assembled. Getting the equipment in the rack took a bit longer.

My only complaint about the rack was that there wasn’t enough cage nuts provided. Otherwise, it was fairly straightforward to get this rack assembled. It did take me longer than the estimated 15 minutes, but not an inordinate amount of time.

You might wonder why I have a rack at home. As you probably know, I work for Nokia. My job involves supporting our Network Security products, which now come out of the Security division under the Software and Services business unit. These servers typically go into machines rooms and are rack-mounted.

While they fit nicely on my floor–which is what they’ve done for the past several months–the machines “slide around” and probably don’t get adequate airflow. The last racks I had were slanted, which was nice because they fit under my desk. The machines were a pain to mount due to the slant, the rack could not be fully utilized due to the slant, and the screws frequently got caught in the screw holes–they didn’t use cage nuts for some reason. I threw those racks away before I moved.

So far, I’m happy with the new rack, but it’s only been a few days.

Jaiku Going Down For Maintenanceku

JaikuFor those of you lucky enough to be on Jaiku, you may have noticed that things haven’t been as responsive as they once were. Thankfully, the Thugs In Charge finally noticed and have scheduled a 24 hour maintenance break starting at 12:01am PST on Wednesday.

In typical Jaiku fashion, there is a thread going on–in Jaiku–about this event. As one poster in the thread put it, Twitter is going to be very busy on Wednesday.

Reality Check: Wireless Service In Indonesia

130794873_359eab9b2d.jpgA reader, whom I’ve been engaged in many private conversations with about how much the mobile operators here in the U.S. rip us off, sent me information about how much mobile phone service costs in Indonesia, along with some basics about how the service works. For the record, Indonesia is the fourth biggest country by population, behind China, India, and the U.S. It is, therefore, a somewhat relevant comparison.

Each outbound minute of calling to a landline costs Rp. 531/minute for the three carriers, calling to a mobile on the same provider costs Rp. 540-813, depending on carrier, and calling a mobile on another operator costs Rp 540-975, depending on carrier. SMS (text messaging) costs Rp. 250-300 within Indonesia, Rp. 500 to locations outside Indonesia. The monthly access fee? Rp. 350, unless you spend a certain amount on your bill.

To put this in American pesos dollars, a minute of calling to a landline costs less than $0.06 a minute, a minute of mobile calling costs less than $0.09, SMS costs $0.03 within Indonesia, $0.05 outside. The access fee is nearly $0.04. And, of course, these costs are for outbound only calls/SMS, incoming calls/SMS are free as they should be.

Let’s compare this with the typical rate plan here in the US, where you pay a certain amount of money (minimum $39.99) for a certain amount of minutes (450 is the minimum, I think), pay a ridiculous amount per minute for overage (up to $0.45, depending on the plan), include made-up fees (”regulatory recovery charge” comes to mind), and of course you pay for incoming and outgoing calls. You might get free mobile-to-mobile or night-and-weekend minutes, but let’s face it–how many people actually use their phones that often during those times?

If you were to actually make 450 outbound minutes worth of calls to a mobile on another carrier in Indonesia–the worst case scenario-it’d work out to almost exactly what you’d pay for a 450 minute rate plan per-month with all the taxes and made-up fees. Of course, if you use less minutes, you don’t actually have to pay for 450 outbound minutes, you pay for–and get charged for– exactly what you use.

And don’t even get me started on SMS charges, which without a package can cost up to $0.20 a pop. International SMS? $0.25 a pop, and you can’t buy packages that include international SMS. How can international SMS only cost $0.05 a message in Indonesia and a quarter in the U.S.?

The CTIA says that other operators worldwide want to become more like the U.S. carriers. No wonder: they’d love to get away with charging for service they don’t provide, and overcharging for the services they do provide, just like U.S. mobile operators! Pity most people in this country haven’t seen how it works elsewhere to know there’s a better way, let alone demanded it.

What irks me even more is that large business demanded a better way, and have gotten it. T-Mobile and AT&T offer to large corporations per minute plans, where you pay a monthly access charge with no minutes included. All inbound/outbound minutes are charged a per-minute charge on the order of what you pay for a minutes of calling in Indonesia. SMS and Data services are add-ons and are charged at the same rates as consumers for similar services.

Why aren’t these plans offered to average consumers? They are, in a sense, in the form of prepaid service. However, all prepaid plans in the U.S. charge far too much per minute. T-Mobile is the only operator approaching a reasonable per-minute rate, but only if you buy 1000 minutes (which costs $100). However, I’d like to see these available as a post-paid plan available to consumers as well. Doubt it will happen.

What do you think? Are we getting ripped off here in the U.S. by the mobile carriers? Leave your thoughts!

(Photo by Wm Jas, used under a Creative Commons license)

CTIA Says We’re Number 1–But In What Exactly?

CTIA LogoThe CTIA–the industry association for wireless carriers here in the US–is spewing their lies creative interpretations of the truth again at the FCC in the form of ex parte communications. What else is new?

In their filing (warning, PDF link) they list 7 areas where the US mobile carriers excel compared to the other “top 10″ countries in terms of Gross Domestic Product, as ranked by the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).

  • Subscribers
  • Minutes Of Use
  • Revenue Received By Carriers per Minute of Use
  • Top Two Carriers Share of Wireless Market
  • Number of Facilities-Based Carriers with More than One Million Subscribers
  • Amount of Spectrum Allocated for Commercial Mobile Wireless
  • Subscribers Servers per MHz of Spectrum

We might be #1 in 6 of these 7 categories, but what does this mean? Hit the jump for more. Keep Reading »

PhoneBoy’s Week That Was 13 January 2008

PhoneBoyThis is the first time in a long time this list has been so short. I have not been in the blogging groove as of late, and when I’ve been in that groove, it’s been really late at night. I’ve had far too many nights where I’ve ended up in bed at nearly 3am. :(

Here’s what I managed to write this past week:

The Problem With Blogging and Blog Networks

295966_trouble_ahead.jpgIf you haven’t figured out by now, I like writing. However, if you asked me when I started blogging if I thought I could write 20-30 posts a week, while still having a full-time job, I’d think you were smoking something. Clearly I’ve figured out how to do it. Some days, it’s easier than others. I’m going through one of those times where it’s hard.

Keep Reading »

If You Don’t Want To Share, Lock The Access Point!

You know, I’m getting sick and tired of seeing the whole debate about whether or not people who are accessing an open WiFi access point are “stealing.” Give me a break. If you don’t want people using your WiFi, configure at least some security.

Ars Technica has a piece covering the ethics of using someone else’s WiFi. They come to the same conclusion that I do. If the WiFi is open, either they are intentionally leaving it open, don’t know, or likely wouldn’t care. Since it’s hard for you to tell the difference, why not use it as long as you’re nice about it?

I also talked about this on Gadgets Weblog as well, though it was before this Ars Technica article came out.

Free Rhapsody For Comcast Subscribers

comcast-rhapsody.png

I got an email from Comcast recently that had a lot of crap I could care less about. However, there was a small little blurb that did catch my attention:

As a Comcast High-Speed Internet customer, you’re entitled to receive a wide range of benefits and services at no additional charge. One of these is called Rhapsody Radio(TM) Plus!

With Rhapsody Radio(TM) Plus, you can listen to over 100 commercial-free radio stations; create your own radio station based on your favorite artists; and download 25 free, full-length songs each month.

Simply download the latest Rhapsody Music Software and manage all your music in one place. This is the only music software you’ll ever need!

Click here for more information.

Given that I’ve been looking for a “free” account to try Rhapsody on the Nokia N800, I figured I’d go through whatever crap I had to in order to come up with something I might be able to use on my Nokia N810. Hit the jump for the gory details.

Keep Reading »

Twibble–Brings Twitter Closer To Jaiku

TwibbleI have been using Twitter a bit more than I was before thanks to this nifty little J2ME app for Nokia phones called Twibble. It runs in the background and pulls the latest tweets from my friends over whatever connection I happen to have. I can page through them at my leisure, respond to them–it is smart and will offer to add a @whoever so you can respond. And, of course, I can send in a tweet.

The app is interesting in that it gives you the choice of using data or SMS to update your contacts. There was actually a bug in how the app saved the SMS number to use–I wanted to change it from the default +44 number to the U.S. shortcode 40404–but they fixed it and I get a shout out in the 0.3.8 update note.

Twibble also gives you the ability to use that L: tag to update your location–either with text or by using the GPS. I feel a bit uncomfortable being that specific with my whereabouts, so I’ll stick to the English name updates to my location.

What surprised me this morning was that I actually received a private tweet from someone–in the Twibble application. I can, of course, send them, but I was shocked that I could get private messages as well through the client. Sweet!

So how does it compare to the Jaiku S60 client? Favorably, though clearly the Jaiku client is more polished UI-wise and actually uses the cell towers to determine location. However, Twibble is network agnostic and will run on any connection that can make an IP-based one, and will use GPS. In any case, you can’t go wrong with this app, though I would like to see a somewhat better presentation of the tweet list. That’s just a little extra frosting on this otherwise tasty cake.

Unified Communications Is A Pipe Dream

Bog RollYou know, I hear this term Unified Communications all the time. It recently came up as I saw the press release of Jajah and CallWave partnering up to “make global communications easier for people and businesses to communicate and collaborate.”

The theory of having all your communication come through one inbox is appealing, no doubt. GrandCentral was on the right track here before Google purchased them and they appear to have stagnated. Maybe they are doing stuff and we just can’t see yet, but when you roll out stuff like gangbusters and go radio silent after being acquired, it doesn’t sit well with users.

Even within the past 24 hours, I get a press release from a company that proclaims they have made all kinds of achievements in the Unified Communications space, bringing together the corporate PBX and the mobile phone. yawn

Anyone who understands the technology knows that unified communications is a pipe dream. Perhaps within a small subset of the possible communication methods, for example the corporate PBX and the corporate-issued mobile phone, it is possible. In the real world, where people actually communicate, it’s not. There are too many ways to communicate and too many parties unwilling to open their networks to allow some unaffiliated third party to create an environment to manage all their communication.

To date, I have not seen a single unified communications “solution”–a buzzword if I ever heard it–incorporate all of the following:

  • SMS (not just sending, but receiving)
  • Skype
  • IM–not just corporate IM, but all public network IM
  • SIP, both outgoing to random SIP URLs and incoming SIP calls
  • Email from multiple locations
  • Social Networking (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, Jaiku)

Until it includes SMS on my mobile phone, which none of the solutions I’ve seen even attempt to deal with, it’s not truly unified. Until it includes Skype–a tool I am using more frequently–it’s not unified. Unless it includes a SIP URL that anyone with an open SIP client can reach, it’s not truly unified. Until it handles all my IM stuff, it’s not unified. Until I can get a unified view of all my email and social networking traffic, it’s not unified.

The truth is, there are so many ways to communicate, it’s downright mind boggling. That’s why, as far as I’m concerned, Unified Communications is nothing more than a meaningless marketing term. Then again, maybe I am missing some facts, or interpreting the term “Unified Communications” in a way that others are not? Feel free to set me straight in the comments.

  • Admin