Comments on: Parallels Versus VMware Fusion: Why One Over The Other? http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other VoIP, Telecom, and Technology Made Simple Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:42:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: VMware Releases Fusion for Mac, Reaches Out To Blogosphere http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-20484 VMware Releases Fusion for Mac, Reaches Out To Blogosphere Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:01:18 +0000 http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-20484 [...] included. Apparently, they wanted an opportunity to answer a question I raised before: Parallels Versus VMware Fusion: Why One Over The Other? I got to ask my question directly and got an [...] […] included. Apparently, they wanted an opportunity to answer a question I raised before: Parallels Versus VMware Fusion: Why One Over The Other? I got to ask my question directly and got an […]

]]> By: kriegspiel http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-19515 kriegspiel Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:34:57 +0000 http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-19515 I believe Fusion lets you allocate both CPUs to a VM, as well as allowing for the install of 64-bit systems. However, it has been pretty unstable for me on a 1.83 C2D MacBook - the related kernel extensions that stay loaded regardless of whether Fusion is running or not have been responsible for many a kernel panic in the last few weeks. I believe Fusion lets you allocate both CPUs to a VM, as well as allowing for the install of 64-bit systems. However, it has been pretty unstable for me on a 1.83 C2D MacBook - the related kernel extensions that stay loaded regardless of whether Fusion is running or not have been responsible for many a kernel panic in the last few weeks.

]]> By: Aaron Huslage http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-19499 Aaron Huslage Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:00:58 +0000 http://alphabeta.phoneboy.com/1570/parallels-versus-vmware-fusion-why-one-over-the-other#comment-19499 I think VMWare has proven to be fairly stable. I switched (pre Parallels 3.0) because Vista performance was awful under Parallels and it was decent under VMWare. My client at the time didn't care...they just wanted things working right. I have no clue why I like VMWare better, but I do. I think VMWare has proven to be fairly stable. I switched (pre Parallels 3.0) because Vista performance was awful under Parallels and it was decent under VMWare. My client at the time didn’t care…they just wanted things working right.

I have no clue why I like VMWare better, but I do.

]]>